walkitout: (Default)
A. is back at school. It was rough getting her up, and she was super exhausted, which I’m attributed to her sleep schedule sliding since the return from vacation. I’d kept her lined up pretty good while in Florida, but the medical event threw me off pretty hard. Despite leaving later than is ideal, I got her to school early enough that she should have made it to class on time. Traffic was light, but lots of emergency vehicles out with flashers and sirens that I had to work around.

A couple nights ago, her bedframe broke. She slept in her brother’s room that night, but his mattress is thin with a mattress pad and it’s not a great sleeping experience. Since we still hadn’t fixed the bed yesterday, around 11 pm A. and I wrestled her mattress (it’s only a double, but it’s one of the higher end Purple so it’s awkward) over to his frame. That helped, but it’s still weird not sleeping in her own space. We’re going to try to get her bed fixed today. It was necessary to get her mattress out of the way to fix the frame, so the work needed to be done. It’s just with R. out of commission with DVT, it’s a bit of a struggle.

Today, we got the last of the photos from J. into a frame and up on the wall. I’ve cleared out the box that the new photos were in, put the old photos into portfolio or other storage, and put the box with the thumb drive of the gallery next to my computer for uploading. Getting the photos into frames and on the wall is always a huge accomplishment. It’s faster but more work, since I quit buying frames, and just reuse the existing ones.

I also got the small artificial tree in its box that was sitting in the hall (T. set it up in his dorm room this year) back into the basement. Just getting the tree in its box, and the photo box out of the downstairs was a huge improvement.

Yesterday, I had a delightful zoom with I.

I also chatted with H. (R.’s cousin) on the phone last night, and we talked through feelings about the less than ideal AirBnB experience. After taking care of the mattress, I did some research and came up with three much better possibilities for next December. I figure I am only going to have the opportunity to create a holiday experience for H. and her mother C. a very small number of times (C. is elderly and fragile, which is part of why this is a difficult problem — she really wants to be isolated and finding a space that is tolerable for H. and for C. for the amount of time involved is tricky), and I’m learning a lot about how personality disorder manifests. The context is sufficiently distant that it’s not overtly stressful for me (mildly annoying on occasion) but at the same time detailed and continuous enough that I can genuinely learn a lot from what I hear and see.

The puzzle I’m working on currently is how to think about enabling and enablers. I’ve come to the conclusion from watching TikTok that virtually everyone producing content (in academic work, in books, in memoirs, on social media) about neurodiversity (whether that’s autism or ADHD or personality disorders or whatever) is operating on the assumption that some or even most of the people surrounding the neurodiverse person are “neurotypical”. Generally this includes the person producing the content, but not always.

This assumption is hilariously, cartoonishly wrong virtually all the time.

With C. and H., it’s not completely clear who is aware of what diagnoses, but one person has been forthcoming, and R. and I are very clear that both parties share comparable diagnoses. At the same time, it is abundantly clear that the dynamic between them, if viewed through more common lenses, would label one of them an Enabler.

Generally, enablers / enabling are characterized as getting more of a free pass than they probably should as “part of the problem”, but the part of the problem they are usually characterized as is that they are preventing feedback from reaching / forcing change / wtf the person with the diagnosis / abusers / problem person / identified victim or perpetrator or whatever. When I’ve historically thought about enabling, I have assigned anyone who is present long-term as part of a dyad with a problem person (spouse, parent, child, business partner or bestie, sibling, whatever) as being just as much a problem as the problem person, and I usually sniff around for their agenda / motive / what they get out of being the Helper, stuff like that. My father, for example, who is about as perfect a match for OCPD as could possibly be imagined, acted very much as an enabler for my mother (who definitely had a personality disorder with borderline and narcissistic overtones, and occasionally other things as well); it’s extremely clear that he picked her (they got married when he was 25 and she was 19) because he wanted a junior partner who was dependent and who would never leave and who would never give him any particular trouble and who would keep house and raise kids and so forth. He had seen his father do the same thing, and I think my dad picked someone who was less of a hard worker than his mother and his older sister for reasons that include things like sexual compatibility and interest and also include the fact that the chaotic emotionality around my mother completely concealed the absolute dead zone of emotion around him.

I’ve been entertaining very seriously the idea that the enabler, in addition to having problems of roughly the same kind and intensity as the person they are enabling, and in addition to having an agenda of their own, may actually not be very good at their job. I was assuming that enabler failings at protecting children from the problem person’s abuse were likely to be part of the enabler’s agenda. If you are having trouble processing that, I’ll try to be really clear. If parent A is beating up the kids, and parent B isn’t stopping it, I’ve been assuming it’s because parent B wanted the kids beat. A lot of people have assumed the contrary. I don’t really know, honestly, but I’m increasingly prepared to entertain the idea that some of the things that the problem person does that the enabler scaffolds / fails to prevent / wtf are actually NOT what the enabler wanted to happen. Like, sometimes the enabler is bad at their job BUT like a lot of people who mess up at work, they are covering up rather than forthrightly being accountable, mitigating harm, remediating, doing all the quality control stuff to prevent recurrence etc.

So I am going to do some experimentation. I’m going to see what happens when I help the enabler do their job better.

I’ll try to report back.

I did get R.’s buy in on this project, because it’s pretty fucking dark as a project, and I feel like it’s best if someone is looking over my shoulder to pull me back if I get a little too gleeful when things get sticky (because 100% I can love that kind of a car wreck), and also these are his relatives.

Obviously, the goal here is to get an answer in at least one case. The question is: if you assist the enabler in what they purport they are trying to do, in a way that is effective, do they then mad scramble to blow it up OR do they actively participate in learning to do their job better. Anyone with experience in this type of situation knows that it is wildly unlikely that there will be a middle ground (passively accept assistance but fail to make any effort to reproduce when successful). If these were truly neurotypical people, there would be middle ground. But that’s not what we’re dealing with here.
walkitout: (Default)
I’ve taken several swings, over the years, at finding people whose experience of separation from family of origin resembled mine. Plenty of people were kicked out of their church, but I disassociated myself. Plenty of people got sick of their parents and wanted nothing more to do with them, but my parents explicitly cut me off when I disassociated myself from the church.

I want to point out there was some optionality there for them. JWs don’t DF associating with their DF’d or DA’d family members and that’s a long-standing policy. But you can’t be an elder or ministerial servant if you hang with your DF’d or DA’d family. They don’t kick you out for going to college, but when the org came out hard against college, my family was very clear that they wanted me to go to college but I had to pay for tuition and books so the whole thing would be presented as, we house and feed her, but she’s the one who decided to go to college what can we do. Going to college was never a DF’able offense, but if you intentionally put a kid in college after a certain point (after my oldest sister had gotten her master’s), you probably wouldn’t be able to be an elder. They’d navigated that; I figured we could probably navigate a low-contact relationship after I left.

But it didn’t work out that way. Or rather, it did for a while, and then broke down irretrievably. There was a period of time where my mother would call me when my father had a health event, because she knew I’d be calm and useful, and my abuser elder sister who was somewhat further away (but not that far — 50 miles or so) and still JW 100% would not be calm and useful. But as my niece and nephew got older, my elder sister involved herself more and that period came to an end.

I’ve always found confusing the vindictive things my mother did next. She’d call and request that I come pick up my things, and I’d go, and they weren’t my things (of course they weren’t — I’d moved out a year before I disassociated). I quit responding to these overtures, and my sister visited with her stepson and stepdaughter and husband. She came back to me with a bag of “my stuff”, and it was more of the same. It was always tricky to explain to people why what my mother was giving me “back” as “my stuff” was so hurtful. People would say, but I’d love to have my baby book! But it was all of a piece with removing all the pictures from the walls of my sister when she left, and then me. Getting rid of the baby book was part of erasing having had me as a baby. Giving it to me was making sure I knew she was doing that.

It was less hurtful to me, but more legible to others, to describe receiving a bag of all the Happy Anniversary cards I’d given my parents that were not signed by my elder sisters (who continued to be JW). As JWs, we celebrated no holidays or birthdays (other than memorial of the last supper, which is a whole can of weird we don’t need to get into here), but in my family, we did celebrate my parents’ wedding anniversary. You are welcome to work out in detail all the problems with this — I certainly have — and I wouldn’t blame you at all if you need a lot of emotional support after that. If the social math is difficult, I will short cut it for you: imagine if your mother had saved every birthday card, mother’s day card, Christmas Card, whatever the fuck card, that you gave her, and handed them all back to you at once, saying, These Are Yours.

When my sister brought back a bag of this type of item, it was like a bomb had gone off in my living room. I called my parents on the phone, and I spoke to my mother, and when I was unsatisfied with that, I spoke to my father. I was extremely clear and calm. I told him that what my mother was doing was a wild violation of the principles and rules laid down by the WBTS / JW organization. He agreed. I said she had to apologize to me. He agreed. Her effort at an apology was completely not an apology, so I told her exactly what she had to say _and she said it_. I then told my father what he had to say, and he said it. Then I said Phyllis was not to contact me again, and he was responsible for ensuring that as the spiritual head of the family, and he agreed. And I said if he chose not to contact me at least quarterly (and notifying me of family funerals did not count) I was going to go forward assuming that he was no longer my father.

And then I said good bye and my mother never contacted me again. I think I might have seen her one more time (I don’t remember now if Maryann died before or after this phone call), and she wanted a hug and I shook her hand instead. She didn’t like that and I really didn’t care. My husband is still paying to this day for having insisted that I invite them to our wedding. We did. They declined. The cousins who came to WDW with us were horrified that my parents didn’t come to the west coast reception. I was completely unsurprised.

My father didn’t contact me again until he learned he had liver cancer (over a decade later). He called me and I took his calls; they ended with the successful surgery. When my mother was well into dementia and he had placed her in a home, he called me to explain things and I reassured him that I was sure he’d done all anyone could expect of him (that was sincere — I am sure he did everything he possibly could to care for her and keep her comfortable). I was traveling to Seattle and he wanted me to visit her in the home, and I declined. I suggested alternate places to meet — a restaurant, my rental, his house — and he balked so I figured it wouldn’t happen but he caved and agreed to have us at the house so we did, which infuriated my sister who came to supervise. My mother died not long after and I was not notified by anyone until a cousin’s wife texted me after the funeral to say she was thinking of me. (This was 7 years ago now.)

I gave my father some time before calling him to ask him why I had not been notified. He could easily enough have said he delegated the task to my sister, and the responsibility was hers, but he did not do that (I am absolutely certain that’s what happened). Nor did he claim forgetfulness. I worked out the list of who was not invited, and it became clear that everyone who could reasonably have been expected to tell me was not notified of Phyllis’ death. I made sure a whole lot more people knew after that that they should not assume I know anything in the future. My sister has stepped fully into her mother’s shoes, and my father continues his enabling of her, as he did his wife.

And that’s basically been it. There were zoom funerals of an aunt and uncle that I attended, but that’s a screen and I was mostly non-responsive to emails around them. Failure to inform me of my own mother’s death and failure to even describe the responsible party was the moment at which I lost whatever vestigial connection I might have felt.

But it was still incredibly confusing. Until today. Having spent days reading all kinds of weird shit about estrangements, it dawned on me that I’d been told repeatedly, since I was wee, _why_ JWs shun. _It’s so people will come back_. That’s why it’s so important to be complete in the shunning, and why the one exception is that if you come to a meeting, you can attend, and you are allowed a greeting. And once at the meeting, you can start the process of working with a Judicial Committee to get back in good standing. _The shunning is not just about compliance or you are out._ The shunning is intended to get you to come back. The whole system is built on contingent love, and avoidant attachment. And I am not. When I left and built a different life, my mother was frantic. I know she was, because I saw how she was when my younger sister left. She couldn’t sleep at night because she was so worried that my younger sister would not survive Armageddon. They wouldn’t get to be in Paradise on Earth for Eternity together. It devastated her. My attitude at the time was, if you miss R., you can call her. (I was still a JW when I said this. Calling is not gonna get you disciplined as long as you keep it to yourself. You just can’t be seen associating publicly.) But my mother wasn’t shunning my sister as part of staying in good status in the religion. She was shunning my sister in a desperate effort to convince my sister to return to the Truth.

When my mother was sending me all those incredible I Am Rejecting You packages, it was an overture to get me to return. See. Look. Do You Not Realize How Shunned You Are. Surely, If You Could Feel How Shunned You Are, You’d Come Back.

It’s _exactly_ stalking.

And I totally failed to realize that until today. (May I remind you that I am VERY autistic.)

So, yeah. The religion part of what happened with my family is actually totally irrelevant. I had become increasingly convinced of that, and just couldn’t quite get my brain to refocus and reframe and see what had _actually_ happened. It turns out that my estrangement was exactly like every other estrangement. We were all adults, but some of the adults weren’t okay with what one of the adults were doing, and what they did next was not okay with that adult, and it led to a rift.

It’s all boundary violations in the end. I tried very hard to live the life they wanted me to live, and I couldn’t. They couldn’t accept me living the life I could live. The End.

And the next time someone comes along and tells you what a pity it is that we all live in echo chambers and can’t get along with people who are different from us, agree with them, remember who they are, and do everything in your power to not interact with them in any way shape or form. Those people are looking to start trouble.
walkitout: (Default)
I specifically went looking for articles about parents cutting ties with their children.

https://www.bbc.com/worklife/article/20221207-the-parents-who-sever-ties-with-their-children

Blake, quoted extensively, was also quoted in a U Penn thesis that I have since lost track of. Blake characterization of social norms / expectations about the parent / child relationship over the life arc is repeated in that thesis as sort of a given, but I found it honestly shocking.

“The relationship between a parent and their child is expected to be lifelong – a fruitful, loving bond that can survive any highs and lows. However, for some parents, maintaining this connection can be difficult. Eventually, a parent might feel they have reached a point of no return, and so choose to step away from their role.”

This kind of assertion without support, this sort of duh, everyone believes this, is just always a bad idea. Plenty of cultures run family systems on Other Than Love — respect, duty, obedience all spring to mind. The family in many cultures is regarded as an element of the social-governmental structure. In the US, and apparently in the UK and probably other countries as well, we seem to have laundered the patriarchal structure in a way that parallels how we laundered marriage. We erased the explicit demands of obedience, but they are still there percolating under the surface, and we’ve added explicit demands to have certain feelings. It’s not a great choice.

July 2025

S M T W T F S
   1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
1314 1516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 15th, 2025 10:32 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios