Covers of books, redux
Jul. 20th, 2006 12:22 amRobert Karen's book on Attachment (0195115015) and Sroufe's book (0521629926) have covers
with airborne babies (Karen's all the way airborne; Sroufe's being lifted high in the air by a mama).
This is bizarre. It's right up there with that evil book I mentioned months ago (0838576656 -- discussed on May 10, 2005. Took a while to find that post. That would be the book about birth that completely erases the mother. And I do mean completely.). Why would, not one, but _two_ books about attachment depict a baby being held up/thrown up into the air? This is _not_ something that one does to a baby most days (I don't think, anyway). Sure, exciting fun, but not primary caregiver exciting fun. More like, energetic non-parent exciting fun.
What the fuck.
Someone please explain this to me.
with airborne babies (Karen's all the way airborne; Sroufe's being lifted high in the air by a mama).
This is bizarre. It's right up there with that evil book I mentioned months ago (0838576656 -- discussed on May 10, 2005. Took a while to find that post. That would be the book about birth that completely erases the mother. And I do mean completely.). Why would, not one, but _two_ books about attachment depict a baby being held up/thrown up into the air? This is _not_ something that one does to a baby most days (I don't think, anyway). Sure, exciting fun, but not primary caregiver exciting fun. More like, energetic non-parent exciting fun.
What the fuck.
Someone please explain this to me.
no subject
Date: 2006-07-20 07:49 pm (UTC)Being airborne, though. An airborne baby is intrinsically alarming, and it's also visually "unattached". I would guess, then, that the idea is to reenforce wonderfulness of of attachment theory by showing its scary visual (and implicitly its conceptual) opposite.
As an ex-baby-thrower myself
Date: 2006-07-21 07:16 am (UTC)To be fair, I don't think I ever tossed a baby. I tended to toss toddlers and young children instead. They're bigger, but they seem much less breakable.
There is a whole category of games (including peek-a-boo and pursuit/catch/release) about separation and reunion. It's possible the cover used baby-tossing as the most visually compact of this universe. Possible. Not likely, but possible. I play peekaboo with Teddy (most mamas do), and I play pursuit/catch/release (some mamas do). I don't know too many baby-tossing mamas. The mamas I've seen lifting their babies were generally doing it for a specific, non-attachment purpose (exercise with your baby programs often involve lifting the kid to develop the arms -- as if one doesn't do this enough already! Toddler swim class involves a lot of baby-lifting/moving in the water).