ha! Arizona property values
Aug. 27th, 2009 09:19 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
walkitouthttp://www.azcentral.com/arizonarepublic/news/articles/0705prop207.html
Arizona was one of the few (possibly only) property rights propositions to survive the 2006 slaughter. Here's a little update on how that's going.
I'm just finding this really, really, really funny. I mean, they're worried about _zoning_ affecting property values in _Arizona_?!
Bwahahahahah...
ETA: This is a bit more recent, but mostly just exposes how 207 was really written to fight anti-sprawl legislation, but leave other kinds of land use regulation intact. Which is a little odd. On the one hand, apparently some takings are okay, but others are not? On the other hand, tactically wise to take a bunch of people who are otherwise going to be quite furious (and have the capability to override you) out of the game.
Arizona was one of the few (possibly only) property rights propositions to survive the 2006 slaughter. Here's a little update on how that's going.
I'm just finding this really, really, really funny. I mean, they're worried about _zoning_ affecting property values in _Arizona_?!
Bwahahahahah...
ETA: This is a bit more recent, but mostly just exposes how 207 was really written to fight anti-sprawl legislation, but leave other kinds of land use regulation intact. Which is a little odd. On the one hand, apparently some takings are okay, but others are not? On the other hand, tactically wise to take a bunch of people who are otherwise going to be quite furious (and have the capability to override you) out of the game.