![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
walkitoutGiven Bloomberg's history, there would be four conceivable slots for him (either party, either position).
I kinda like a lot of what Bloomberg has done, and some of the most obviously Not So Great things (blowing past term limits when he said he wouldn't) seemed a little 'meh'. This, however, is a compelling argument against voting for him:
http://gawker.com/5979679/id-do-her-a-brief-history-of-michael-bloombergs-public-sexism
Sort of an interesting piece to put out there; dunno what prompted it, but it sure looks like maneuvering to shut down a possible run.
I kinda like a lot of what Bloomberg has done, and some of the most obviously Not So Great things (blowing past term limits when he said he wouldn't) seemed a little 'meh'. This, however, is a compelling argument against voting for him:
http://gawker.com/5979679/id-do-her-a-brief-history-of-michael-bloombergs-public-sexism
Sort of an interesting piece to put out there; dunno what prompted it, but it sure looks like maneuvering to shut down a possible run.