walkitout: (Default)
[personal profile] walkitout
This statement caught my eye in Erik Sherman's entertaining survey of numbers involving ebooks.

According to Simba, "professional and scholarly books, which include the legal, scientific/technical, medical and business segments, hold 75.9% of the $1.76 billion U.S. E-book market."

I'm working on a framework for making sense of ebook numbers. I'm going to deploy that, starting with, what's the size of that pie and, what's _in_ that pie.

AAP numbers are the ones trade publishers look at. Simba is trying to make the point that trade isn't the big part of the e-book pie. If you want to read Simba's report, you have to shell out beaucoup bucks for the privilege, and while I'm quite dedicated to mocking lame coverage, I'm not (yet) _that_ dedicated. Let's start with a quickie sanity check.

Here are the 2010 numbers from AAP:

http://www.publishers.org/press/24/

E-books in AAP totaled $441.3M in 2010.
Professional books in AAP (unspecified whether this is pbooks, ebooks or both) totaled $812.9M

Let's compare $812.9 to .76*1.76 billion. Oh, look: it is substantially less. AAP numbers are about a smaller pie than Simba and one of drastically different composition (specifically, I suspect that a lot of the libraries referred to in the Simba press release are law libraries or medical libraries -- not public libraries in the sense we are mostly accustomed to).

This is a point where Sherman's analysis is weak.

http://www.bnet.com/blog/technology-business/guess-what-no-one-knows-how-big-the-e-book-business-is-update/10199

"When such companies as Amazon or Barnes & Noble (BKS) claim that e-book sales have overtaken paperbacks or hard covers, would that include these very expensive titles?"

No. The kinds of publications that Simba must have been including are not sold any place you are likely to recognize unless you buy those books and if you buy those books, you know that Sherman's question is misguided. For example, the Collier Consumer Bankruptcy Practice Guide is available for sale through Lexis Nexis for $337 in a format compatible with the kindle, but is not available through the kindle store. I feel _slightly_ bad saying Amazon doesn't carry the kinds of titles that Simba is including in their pie, because Practising Law Institute DOES list a lot (perhaps all) of their titles in the kindle store, and PLI is a recognized CLE provider.

It only took me 10 minutes to track down and document the above information, however, I had to know ahead of time what to look for (no, I did not know about PLI when I started, but I knew how to find some professional titles in the kindle store because I'd seen them before -- and knew they were comparatively unusual; no, I did not know that LexisNexis ran an online storefront selling kindle professional titles for CLE until I did a little googling). If you would like to play this game a little more yourself, check this out:

http://www.aclea.org/Resources/OnlineCLEBookstores/tabid/101/Default.aspx

This is actually sort of interesting, since my lawyer sister-in-law (the one who is not a law professor) has to transport through greater NYC trains and so forth a truly heinous load of law stuff including books. It was causing her back problems for a while (altho that's going better now) -- exactly the kind of thing that makes us all want high school students to have their textbooks in electronic format. So here's hoping over the long haul, professionals have e-everything to save their backs.
From: [identity profile] rolandgo.livejournal.com
My dad complained about new lawyers he was training at Mass Mutual in the mid 1980's -- that they didn't know how to use the physical books. They only knew how to use Lexis Nexis. Given my dad, this was an exaggeration, but he couldn't have fabricated the truth entirely. Seems like the physical to electronic transition at least began in law schools during the early 1980's.

At the UofI in the early 90's many of the bound journals were getting replaced by CD format scans of those journals -- saving a lot of space in an increasingly crowded Engineering Library. That library is now housed in a new much larger building. But it really was the leading edge. First the ACM and various physicists started making thing available, then some of them dropped the print format (notably Physical Letters of Science 1 through N IIRC).

About 1997, Digital switched from a physical library in ZKO to paying for a corporate license with access to ACM, IEEE and other journals via an internet portal. An individual can pay a couple hundred bucks per organization per year, get membership discounts (for conferences), access to the library and a single monthly glossy magazine.

I can totally see how these "electronic publications" would skew the numbers for the early part of the eBook adoption curve. But at this point journals & things like Lexis Nexis and its medical equivalents have been widely adopted. So the distortions have got to decrease over time.

I'd never thought about these things as eBooks, but as journals or data bases of journals. But if you're counting "publications" ...

January 2026

S M T W T F S
     1 23
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 3rd, 2026 09:15 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios