Date: 2010-12-18 04:28 am (UTC)
There was the citation thing, but mostly he's against anything that enables students to skim and cherry-pick even more than they already do (he gave the example of a student who said "I do not think I have enough time to read ____ completely"). Now, granted, you're not supposed to take your assigned basic texts and just read teeny bits of them, obviously. But students who avoid all reading (a) will do such things anyway, and (b) are easy to spot. If they can't fool you anyway, flunk 'em, I say, and if they can fool you, you're not reading THEIR stuff attentively enough.

I do remember some of my high school teachers being unhappy when people had different editions of books and they couldn't say, "All right, on page 35 -- everyone on page 35?" I suppose there's a bit of that. But this is college: let the students handle it if their edition is different (possibly by sneaking a peek at their neighbor's book and doing a keyword search ...).

Oh, and I think to people who have never used one (which he doesn't seem to have), ebook readers just feel skim-y, as if it wouldn't be possible to really settle into reading a book all the way through. I certainly feel that way, even though I know intellectually that it probably wouldn't be true once I got used to using one. Maybe he has some unexamined feelings of that kind.
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
(will be screened if not validated)
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

July 2025

S M T W T F S
   1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
1314 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 242526
2728293031  

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 25th, 2025 02:49 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios