Divorce and Genealogy
Jul. 31st, 2022 09:57 amA lot of people think about genealogy in terms of looking up parents, grandparents etc. They get a little further along, and they get interested in finding cousins, or better stories, or celebrity connections and start looking at collateral relatives — aunts, great uncles, third cousins twice removed, whatever. But even then, still tend to be thinking in terms of when were they born, when did they die. After a while, maybe _where_ were they born, where did they die. They get interested in marriages.
People who get into genealogy because of a health concern will sometimes look into _why_ they died, and look for patterns in age at death and similar. When I realized that Washington State had a really open records law, I pulled all the death records I could. It was really depressing.
I also pulled divorce records for one grandmother who I knew was married several times, and for a great-grandfather who I had realized was married several times. Those were absolutely bizarre excursions into court systems and kinda sad?
Lately, I’ve been just doing “hints”, which is a lot of 1950s census records, and some other things that have been added since the last time I was actively working on my tree. And let me just say: all those cliches about homophobes being gay turn out to _also_ apply to divorce. If you have a family that is just _death_ on the topic of divorce, you are looking at a family in which just about every marriage has at least one previous marriage that is being actively concealed.
I posted about Audrey. Audrey’s unusual in a host of ways (married at 14! Then at 22. And then at 12 year intervals, like clockwork. I mean, what?). But what I had not realized was how many _other_ divorces were scattered liberally through my father’s immediate family. One sister had a tragic life with no marriage. But the other sister had a squeaky clean life history: missionary for the cult, married once, life long marriage ending with the death of her husband, good relationships with the in-laws and with the cult side of the family. And now I’m looking at a hint that indicates husband had a previous marriage? What? The remaining brother (not the one who married Audrey) again, squeaky clean life history; in that case, I was well aware of the wife’s previous marriage. She also was in a circus for a while; there is a picture of her riding an elephant. She was a delight and everyone loved her and we all miss her still.
I’m quite skeptical of marriage in general, altho as a genealogist, it’s kind of nice that it leaves records of relationships for later generations to explore. I have no problem with divorce, other than that a lot of people probably wait way too long to get divorced and it would all be so much better if people called it off quicker. But I was raised by people who were really, really, really against divorce. And I’m starting to see that as them telling on themselves.
People who get into genealogy because of a health concern will sometimes look into _why_ they died, and look for patterns in age at death and similar. When I realized that Washington State had a really open records law, I pulled all the death records I could. It was really depressing.
I also pulled divorce records for one grandmother who I knew was married several times, and for a great-grandfather who I had realized was married several times. Those were absolutely bizarre excursions into court systems and kinda sad?
Lately, I’ve been just doing “hints”, which is a lot of 1950s census records, and some other things that have been added since the last time I was actively working on my tree. And let me just say: all those cliches about homophobes being gay turn out to _also_ apply to divorce. If you have a family that is just _death_ on the topic of divorce, you are looking at a family in which just about every marriage has at least one previous marriage that is being actively concealed.
I posted about Audrey. Audrey’s unusual in a host of ways (married at 14! Then at 22. And then at 12 year intervals, like clockwork. I mean, what?). But what I had not realized was how many _other_ divorces were scattered liberally through my father’s immediate family. One sister had a tragic life with no marriage. But the other sister had a squeaky clean life history: missionary for the cult, married once, life long marriage ending with the death of her husband, good relationships with the in-laws and with the cult side of the family. And now I’m looking at a hint that indicates husband had a previous marriage? What? The remaining brother (not the one who married Audrey) again, squeaky clean life history; in that case, I was well aware of the wife’s previous marriage. She also was in a circus for a while; there is a picture of her riding an elephant. She was a delight and everyone loved her and we all miss her still.
I’m quite skeptical of marriage in general, altho as a genealogist, it’s kind of nice that it leaves records of relationships for later generations to explore. I have no problem with divorce, other than that a lot of people probably wait way too long to get divorced and it would all be so much better if people called it off quicker. But I was raised by people who were really, really, really against divorce. And I’m starting to see that as them telling on themselves.