Jan. 8th, 2009

walkitout: (Default)
I got e-mail from a friend having trouble with the "My Name Here" part of her From: line when using aol's e-mail. Not sure why she asked me; probably because she figured I'd be able to answer. In the process of coming up with an answer, I got A. an e-mail account over on KOL (the kids version of AOL).

Not that e-mail is something a 3 month old really needs. She has a great screen name tho.
walkitout: (Default)
http://well.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/01/05/exercise-machines-gathering-dust/

This is the Well blog over at the NYT. I'm a few pages into the thread (not quite done -- it's taking a while), and the summary so far:

A lot of people find exercise equipment, especially treadmills, really boring.
But they can consistently use them by getting on them first thing in the morning. They have a water bottle stashed the night before.
Some people use them in the evening, by bribing themselves with NPR broadcasts, iPods, the Daily Show/Colbert Report and/or a Netflix subscription.
A lot of people _really_ love their Concept 2 rower. No one has mentioned buying one and not using it.
A lot of people let a Nordic Track gather a lot of dust (or a crappy exercise bike, or an elliptical).
A small number of people _wear out_ Nordic Tracks; they buy replacements used. Presumably from people who let theirs collect dust.
People who attempt to get their equipment repaired are rarely happy about how that turns out. People who replace worn out equipment are often happy, especially when they replace used with newer second-hand.
People who buy used exercise equipment tend to be happy about the experience, whether they ever use it or not.
Ellipticals are surprisingly unnice to a lot of people's knees, given that they are supposed to be good for that body part.
While nearly everyone who acquires exercise equipment puts it in the basement at least initially, many of the people who consistently use their exercise equipment have it in their bedroom, living room or den -- in a main living area with TV and/or sound system (possibly portable, like an iPod).
Many people who don't use exercise equipment are kinda jackasses about people who buy exercise equipment. They extol the wonders of outdoor exercise, gym memberships, dogs and assert that owners of home exercise equipment never really use them, other than to attempt to convince other people that they're trying to lose weight/get in shape.
A lot of people who live in apartment buildings with exercise equipment find the location of the exercise equipment inconvenient and/or the equipment inferior.
A number of people describe exercise routines involving yoga, stretching and resistance training as somehow comparable to cardio machines.

A lot of Well comments threads are creepily judgmental, or a bunch of people complaining about something in a very repetitive way, or people who misunderstood the originating article, or arguments about another comment. This is an unusually wonderful comments thread, reminiscent of threads on the New Old Age (altho not one I read recently; it may have deteriorated in the last few weeks -- I haven't been checking in much lately). I think the key to getting a good comments thread is writing an article about something that is a _very_ common problem (buying exercise equipment at the beginning of the year, using it briefly and then not so much) which is a little embarrassing, rarely discussed, but interesting in its perplexity. People want to know they aren't alone, they want to share their experiences -- both what did not work for them and what eventually did.

ETA: Oh, yeah. The posts signed by MDs are among the most useless. The MDs _aren't_ talking about their personal experience. They're either giving advice, or describing patients who don't take their advice. More like the typical Well comment thread.
walkitout: (Default)
H/T DaddyTypes

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/magazine/7817496.stm

Periodically I tell people that I read somewhere (not here) that pink used to be for boys and blue for girls. They never believe me. But the author of this piece clearly read something similar.

Otherwise, kinda silly.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090107/ap_on_he_me/med_c_section_timing

DT points out coverage problems with this.

Me, I'm just goggling at the rarity of scheduled c-sections after 41 weeks. I must be a rare one indeed. I was also contemplating some of the hypothetical reasons given. We did indeed schedule it for Friday, rather that trying to push through to Monday (which would have put us at 43 weeks) in part because of mother-in-law's schedule (come on. It's _not_ unreasonable to schedule things to ensure additional help.).

Article at the Chicago Tribune about cribs, new regulations first time in a couple decades.

http://archives.chicagotribune.com/2008/nov/16/local/chi-cribsnov16

Creepiest bit:

...cribs are designed for a family to leave a baby unattended for many hours at a time...

Yeah. That would would basically be my entire problem with a crib. Right there. I'm sort of lying about the "creepiest bit", because there's a story further down about a 9 month old in a crib (one hopes the parents didn't put her back in that crib after that incident).

Good news tho -- looks like we're finally ditching voluntary standards. About fucking time.

August 2025

S M T W T F S
      1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11121314 1516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31      

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Aug. 16th, 2025 11:12 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios